OJ Simpson Conspiracy: Johnnie Cochran, Snake or Saint? You judge!
The now deceased brilliant lawyer Johnnie Cochran has a slip of the tongue while cameras are rolling during the murder trial of OJ Simpson and agrees in concealing phone records that could have freed Simpson from suspicion. The issue of betrayal centers around whether Simpson was in a chauffeur driven limousine while his wife was alive and well talking to her mother on the phone at approximately 11 PM. The Juditha Brown telephone record evidence was removed secretly from Simpson’s case file by one of the prosecutors in his trial and Johnnie Cochran knew and went along with this.
Tags: Black, black and white, conspiracy, courtroom drama, crime and punishment, crime drama, domestic abuse, domestic violence, drugs, lapd, murder mystery, murderer, OJ Simpson, racism, racist, trial, White
August 28th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
@BubbaLiu7 Drop the legal nonsense you jew
August 28th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
@bothan101 I believe he was speeding to, and there was his taxis or limo or whatever waiting outside for 45 minutes until he finally came out..but regardless they did end up finding him guilty, they used a cleaner way of saying it because he did end up not getting sent away for life but at the same time they wanted to close the case and ended up finding him liable..you can google it cuz its hard to explain.
August 28th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
I am still not convinced I have been at war with some body on the internet, although I must admit that finally some body is making semi-logical points in regards towards O.J Simpson’s innocence I am still not convinced I believe that O.J Simpson is guilty, it is just the District Attorney’s were dead wrong regarding the time line of these murders further more as is my understanding it is about a 90 minute drive from O.J Simpson’s place to Nicole’s place I am sure that O.J Simpson was speeding.
August 28th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
FREE OJ
August 28th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
@TruthFan ” I don’t get it, where does it say the phone cal took place at 11pm?”
In the autopsy report on Nicole Brown Simpson according to father, Lou Brown, to coroner’s investigator, Claudine Ratcliffe, on 06/13/94 and by the mother Juditha Brown to attorney Robert Shapiro on page 33 of his book “Search for Justice” on 06/16/94. 11:00 PM is more consistent with the 90 minute drive that Dets. Vannatter and Lang agree it takes to make the drive from Brentwood to Dana Point.
August 28th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
I don’t get it, where does it say the phone cal took place at 11pm?
August 28th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
@BubbaLiu7 Well, bubba, your point is well taken; however, I hope that you haven’t arrived at a conclusion that the Cal. Evidence Code is exempt from challenge in a federal court when it has been charged that provisions of the state evidence code have been employed in such a manner to violate one’s federally protected guarantees. What we are alleging is as Professor J.H. Wigmore cites a case of abuse of the misuse of the privilege of attorney stipulation by agreeing to manipulate evidence.
August 28th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
@brotherap a few things… while the U.S. legal system evolved from English common law, it is not controlling law. The FRCrimP don’t require a defendant to disclose all “crucial evidence.” Also, this was a case under California State Law so you should probably be trying to cite the California Evidence Code rather than the Federal Rules of Evidence.
not taking valerinsky’s side… i cant even understand what he’s trying to say. Just saying you should get your sources straight.
August 28th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
“get your pants off the ground”
starsfound, just comment on the clip, dummy! No one has time to figure out some clandestine s*** that an ignorant ass dummy like you is trying to convey. Direct your comments to what the investigators are providing to the world in the clip. Don’t bother me with some juvenile silliness like the above. If you’re done, get the F*** back over on the channel with that Tella Tubbie/Barney s***. I know that your silly ass can comprehend that BS while smoking.
August 28th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
@brotherap..get your pants off the ground
August 28th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
@valerinsky do you have a better strategy ? Uh?
Yes, valerinsky, I do. Call on Verizon Communications to release a copy of the Juditha Brown phone record so that one can determine whether Simpson’s in-laws traveled between Brentwood and their home in Dana Point, CA. in a 45-60 minute time period between 8:40 and 9:37PM. If they did not, then Simpson was probably on a flight to Chicago while his wife Nicole was still alive at 11PM which was the original time first stated by Simpsons in-laws.
August 28th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
“where did you get this “only the jury can examine evidences”
valerinsky, listen closely, silly MF, “crucial evidence” or “disputed evidence” is what I said. I got “it” from the rules of (English) common law the system that U.S. Courts are based on, the Uniform Rules of Evidence Code, & the Federal Rules of Evidence. The evidence that was concealed is crucial evidence, in conflict, thus it fell exclusively under the domain of the “trier of fact”/ or a jury in a common law court system.
August 28th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
Piece of shit , cocksucker, Johnnie Cochrane, Jr. was a fifty million dollars a year lawyer, graduated in UCLA, and you are nothing but a web nerd, masturbating before the screen, how dare you outrage his honor and disrespect his memory just like that? He took his client behind the bars, do you have a better strategy ? Uh?
August 28th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
Asshole, you don’t know what you talking, half educated dope fiend, where did you get this “only the jury can examine evidences”, where did you get this? On HBO? Fuck you skinhead dope boy fresh! “Getta outta here” who do you think your are? Keep up with this , you’ll end up in hospital or worse, гей девушка инкубировали!
August 28th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
valerinsky, You don’t know what the **** you’re talking about.
There is NO ******** law that allows attorneys to conceal crucial evidence , evidence in dispute, or evidence that must be authenticated from a jury. Only the jury can examine such evidence to decide the guilt or innocense of the accused. Getta the **** outta here with that invented ignorant bull**** you came up with! Smoke another joint and sit the **** down, you crazy MF!
August 28th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
No you all ignorants, he couldn’t agree to bring light to evidences he did not know at all, it is a primary bar litigance rule.
August 28th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
argotis, start with OJ Simpson: Serpents Rising Hidden Phone Records first and then come back to this one. I think if you do that first you might understand the betrayal.
August 28th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
who was betrayed in this?….it makes no sense